Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
VAK Russia 5.2.3
UDC 332.36
Foreign experience in assessing the efficiency of reclaimed agriculture has shown its importance for densely populated and developed countries with intensive methods of increasing efficiency. On the basis of Russian studies and sectoral methodological documents, the article formulates the basic principles of assessment, proposes the methodological approach and performs the comparative assessment of the efficiency of reclaimed agriculture in Russia’s regions. Using the key indicator of efficiency, the labor productivity in crop production of 78 regions of the RF was evaluated for 2020-2022, a high degree of its interregional differentiation was established. The leading regions with a high level of productivity are Belgorod, Voronezh, Kursk, Lipetsk, Orel, Tambov, Astrakhan regions, Krasnodar Territory, etc., the regions that are significantly inferior to the leaders and the average in the RF include the Stavropol and Altai Territories, the Volgograd and Saratov regions that have a high national importance of crop production (contribution to the all-Russian production is more than 2.5%). The authors have constructed a two-factor grouping of regions, which simultaneously characterizes the comparative level of labor productivity in crop production and the level of land reclamation in regions, which confirmed that most regions need a significant expansion of reclaimed agriculture to realize the potential for productivity growth. A comparative assessment of the financial condition of organizations in crop production is carried out with the identification of leading and outsider regions. Regions with high national importance of land reclamation have been identified. A high level of land reclamation was noted for regions that are not the main producers in crop production. The necessity of targeted state support for reclamation activities for regions with favorable natural and climatic conditions, but with low profitability of agricultural organizations is substantiated.
reclaimed agriculture, regions, comparative assessment of effectiveness, labor productivity, profitability of organizations
1. Bolfe, É. & Jorge, L. & Sanches, I. & Luchiari Junior, A. & da Costa, C. & Victoria, D. & Inamasu, R. & Grego, C. & Ferreira, V. & Restrepo Ramirez, A. (2020). Precision and Digital Agriculture: Adoption of Technologies and Perception of Brazilian Farmers. Agriculture. 10(12), 653. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10120653
2. Twerski, A., Fischer, C., & Albrecht, H. (2021). Effects of rare arable plants on plant diversity, productivity and soil fertility in agricultural fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 307, 107237. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107237
3. Ye S., Ren Sh., Song Ch. &Cheng Ch. & Shen Sh. & Yang J. & Zhu D. (2022). Spatial patterns of county-level arable land productive-capacity and its coordination with land-use intensity in mainland China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 326(2):10775. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107757
4. Sedova N.V., Ugryumova A.A. Metodicheskiy podhod k ekonometricheskoy ocenke proizvoditel'nosti melioriruemogo sel'skogo hozyaystva v regionah // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2024. №9. S. 79-85. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.33305/249-79
5. Interlenghi, S.F., de Medeiros J.L. & de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo, O. (2023). Sustainability of Methylic and Ethylic Biodiesel Production Routes. Social and Environmental Impacts Via Multi-Criteria and Principal Component Analyses Using Brazilian Case Studies. Woodhead Series in Bioenergy. Woodhead Publishing. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/C2023-0-00015-2
6. Dimitrijević, M. (2023). Technological progress in the function of productivity and sustainability of agriculture: The case of innovative countries and the Republic of Serbia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 14.100856. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100856
7. Pawlewicz, A., Pawlewicz, K. (2018). Regional differences in agricultural production potential in the European Union Member States. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference Economic Science for Rural Development, no. 47, Jelgava, LLU ESAF, May 9-11, 2018: 483-489.
8. Chivu, L., Andrei, V.J., Zaharia, M., Gogonea, R.-M. (2020). A regional agricultural efficiency convergence assessment in Romania – Appraising differences and understanding potentials. Land Use Policy, vol. 99, 104838. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104838
9. Chepik A.G., Mazhayskiy Yu.A., Doronkin Yu.V. Ekologicheskaya effektivnost' v sisteme vedeniya sel'skogo hozyaystva na melioriruemyh zemlyah // Vestnik Brestskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. 2023. №1(130). S. 129-133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36773/1818-1112-2023-130-1-129-133
10. Smirnova E.A., Postnova M.V., Tarasova E.A. Metodologiya i instrumentariy ocenki proizvoditel'nosti truda v agrarnyh formirovaniyah Ul'yanovskoy oblasti: monografiya. Ul'yanovsk: UlGAU, 2019. 160 S.
11. Saubanov K.R. Ocenka proizvoditel'nosti agrarnoy otrasli regiona // Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Respubliki Tatarstan. 2008. № 5. S.79-83.
12. Dubenok N.N., Yanko Yu.G., Petrushin A.F., Kalinichenko R.V. Perspektivy ispol'zovaniya dannyh distancionnogo zondirovaniya v ocenke sostoyaniya meliorativnyh sistem i effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya meliorirovannyh zemel' // Sovremennye problemy distancionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa. 2019. T. 16. № 3. S. 96-104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21046/2070-7401-2019-16-3-96-104
13. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po ocenke effektivnosti investicionnyh proektov melioracii sel'skohozyaystvennyh zemel'. Minsel'hoz Rossii, Moskva, 2002. URL: http://ohranatruda.ru/upload/iblock/d9e/4293845763.pdf?ysclid=m699cn5uq5491973997 (data obrascheniya 23.03.2025)
