VAK Russia 5.2.3 UDC 338.4

COSTS AND FINANCIAL RESULTS IN AGRICULTURE OF RUSSIA AND BELARUS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BASED ON OPEN STATISTICAL DATA Costs and financial results in agriculture of Russia and Belarus: a comparative analysis based on open statistical data

Published in INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL · Issue 5, 2026 · Pages 612–615 · Rubric: International experience in agriculture
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_5_612
Received: 16.04.2026 Accepted: 27.05.2026 Published: 15.09.2026
The relevance of the study is determined by the growing importance of a comparable assessment of cost conditions and financial results in agriculture under price volatility, uneven output dynamics and differences in the openness of national statistical systems. For Russia and Belarus, this issue has practical significance for evaluating current agricultural efficiency and for improving accounting and analytical support for managerial decisions. The purpose of the study is to compare cost conditions and financial results in the agricultural sectors of Russia and Belarus on the basis of open statistical data and to identify differences in production structure, producer price dynamics, profitability parameters and statistical observability of financial outcomes. The methodological basis relies on official statistics of the Federal State Statistics Service of Russia and the National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus, as well as on comparative, index, structural and analytical methods. The study uses indicators of agricultural output, production indices, producer price indices, output structure, revenue, net profit, sales profitability, the share of profitable farms and territorial differentiation of production and finance. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that the comparison is carried out not only through conventional indicators of output and profitability, but also through the degree of availability of open financial statistics and through the author’s indicators of price asymmetry and loss coverage by profit. The results show that in 2024 Russian agriculture operated under a decline in physical output combined with an increase in producer prices, while Belarusian agriculture recorded output growth. The analysis demonstrates that the Russian model is characterized by a more pronounced price asymmetry between crop and livestock production, whereas the Belarusian farm sector shows a higher share of profitable units and a more complete open statistical representation of revenue, profit and profitability. These findings make it possible to refine the interpretation of costs and financial results in the agrarian economies of Russia and Belarus through the interaction of production structure and statistical transparency.
costs, financial results, Russia, Belarus, open statistical data, profitability
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Bethwell C., Sattler C., Stachow U. An analytical framework to link governance, agricultural production practices, and the provision of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes // Ecosystem Services. 2022. Vol. 53. P. 101402. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101402

2. Briamonte L., Frascarelli A., Pecorino B. Financial instruments and access to credit for the development of agricultural and agri-food enterprises: ecological and digital transition // Economia Agro-Alimentare. 2023. Vol. 25, No. 2. P. 7-14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2023oa16097

3. Cao L., Wang G. Impact of digital finance on agricultural output: from the perspective of digital development of agriculture // Finance Research Letters. 2024. Vol. 66. P. 105698. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105698

4. Chamorro-Padial J., García R., Gil R. A systematic review of open data in agriculture // Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2024. Vol. 219. P. 108775. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.108775

5. Dmytriieva V., Sviatets Yu. Turning points in agriculture development in Ukraine: results of analysis on the base of purified data // Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2021. Vol. 7, No. 1. P. 5-21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2021.07.01.01

6. Kuang M. Performance evaluation of agricultural financial funds based on smart big data analysis // Mobile Information Systems. 2022. Vol. 2022. P. 5046869. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5046869

7. Kumar A., Pant S. Analytical hierarchy process for sustainable agriculture: an overview // MethodsX. 2023. Vol. 10. P. 101954. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101954

8. Pavlova K., Trichkova-Kashamova E., Dimitrov S. Risk Assessment on an Agricultural Farm // WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics. 2024. Vol. 21. P. 1418-1427. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.116

9. Qassis O. Agriculture and food in the West Bank after October 7, 2023 // Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment. 2024. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cuag.12318

10. Andryuschenko S. A., Kutenkov R. P., Bondarenko Yu. P. Effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya osnovnyh fondov kak faktor povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti regional'nyh APK // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2021. № 5. S. 8-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32651/215-8

11. Bykovskaya N. V., Kamaykina I. S., Marinicheva A. V. Ocenka finansovogo sostoyaniya sel'skohozyaystvennyh organizaciy v zavisimosti ot razmera // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2022. № 6. S. 100-102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32651/226-100

12. Bykovskaya N. V., Poddubnaya Z. V., Dolgova E. A. Ocenka finansovogo sostoyaniya sel'skohozyaystvennyh organizaciy v zavisimosti ot vida deyatel'nosti // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2022. № 5. S. 91-96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32651/225-91

13. Zinchenko A. P., Kagirova M. V. Ocenka razvitiya sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii v sisteme nacional'nyh schetov // Voprosy statistiki. 2021. T. 28, № 5. S. 28-38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-5-28-38

14. Ivanov Yu. N., Ponomarenko A. N., Sil'chuk A. A. K voprosu ob interpretacii statisticheskogo pokazatelya raspolagaemogo dohoda domashnih hozyaystv // Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2021. T. 25, № 2. S. 292-308. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2021-25-2-292-308

15. Medvedeva T. A., Alekseeva N. V., Ivanov E. A., Semenov A. A., Tolstova M. L., Stepanov A. V. Finansy predpriyatiy agropromyshlennogo kompleksa: aktual'nye voprosy analiza i upravleniya // Agrarnaya nauka. 2022. № 11. S. 194-199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-364-11-194-199

16. Semenova G. N. Ocenka finansovogo polozheniya sel'skohozyaystvennyh organizaciy v Rossii // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2024. № 11. S. 67-74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32651/2411-67

17. Sobolev O. S. Mezhdunarodnaya statistika agroprodovol'stvennyh cen v 2024 godu // Ekonomika sel'skohozyaystvennyh i pererabatyvayuschih predpriyatiy. 2025. № 3. S. 88-94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31442/0235-2494-2025-0-3-88-94

18. Churilova E. Yu. Analiz dinamiki i prognozy proizvodstva produkcii sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2025. № 10. S. 60-70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33305/2510-60

19. Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki. Sel'skoe hozyaystvo v Rossii. 2025 [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/S_x_2025.pdf (data obrascheniya: 15.03.2026).

20. Nacional'nyy statisticheskiy komitet Respubliki Belarus'. Ob izmenenii cen proizvoditeley sel'skohozyaystvennoy produkcii po Respublike Belarus'. 2024 god [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.belstat.gov.by/upload-belstat/upload-belstat-pdf/oficial_statistika/2024/Infgrafika_prise_ch_2024.pdf (data obrascheniya: 15.03.2026).

21. Nacional'nyy statisticheskiy komitet Respubliki Belarus'. Deyatel'nost' krest'yanskih (fermerskih) hozyaystv v Respublike Belarus'. 2020–2024 [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.belstat.gov.by/upload/iblock/996/c5cxlfv9yqti3jjsicjd1bbh9ulhq25w.pdf (data obrascheniya: 15.03.2026).