FGIS «GRAIN» AS A LEGAL INSTITUTION: BETWEEN TRACEABILITY AND QUASI-LICENSING OF TURNOVER

Petr V. Korotchenko; Viktor A. Mayboroda

doi:10.55186/25880209_2026_10_3_31

VAK Russia 1.6.15 UDC 349.42 UDC 004.9

3 more Collapse

FGIS «GRAIN» AS A LEGAL INSTITUTION: BETWEEN TRACEABILITY AND QUASI-LICENSING OF TURNOVER

Published in INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL · Volume 9, Issue 3 · Pages 220–237 · Rubric: 1.6.15. Land management, cadastre and land monitoring (economic sciences)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25880209_2026_10_3_31 · EDN: ELOLBT

Received: 13.04.2026 Accepted: 29.05.2026 Published: 01.06.2026

Authors

Petr V. Korotchenko

Viktor A. Mayboroda

Petr V. Korotchenko

Duma of the Stavropol Territory Deputy · Russian Federation · Stavropol

Union of Agricultural Employers of the Stavropol Territory Chairman · Russian Federation · Stavropol

Stavropol regional branch of Delovaya Rossiya co-chairman · Russian Federation · Stavropol

SHP Dobrovolnoye Chairman of the Board of Directors · Russian Federation · Stavropol

Viktor A. Mayboroda

North-West Management Institute of The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration professor · Department of Civil and Labor Law · St. Petersburg

ABSTRACT

Introduction. The Federal State Information System for Traceability of Grain and Grain Processing Products (FSIS "Zerno"), enshrined in Articles 17.1–18.2 of the Law of the Russian Federation of May 14, 1993 No. 4973‑I "On Grain," is positioned by the legislator as an information and analytical tool for recording grain turnover volumes. However, the actual legal effect of this institution extends beyond its accounting function and generates a system of risks for agricultural producers. This article is devoted to a critical analysis of the legal design of this institution. Materials and methods. The study is based on a doctrinal analysis of the current version of the Grain Law (as amended by Federal Law No. 304-FZ of July 31, 2025, as of March 1, 2026), as well as on an analysis of law enforcement practice, including the official response of the Department of Digitalization and Technological Development of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia dated May 28, 2026. Formal-legal, systemic-structural, and teleological methods of interpretation were applied, along with elements of the economic analysis of law. Results. A structural contradiction was identified between the declared information and accounting function of FSIS "Zerno" and its actual role as a market access instrument. It was found that combining information-monitoring and turnover-authorization circuits within a single normative act leads to a situation where any technical or personnel failure in digital document processing formally places quality products in the position of goods subject to seizure. It is shown that this design disproportionately burdens small agricultural producers, reinforcing their dependence on large intermediaries, and generates a "digital risk discount" in grain pricing. Discussion. A concept of four legislative amendments is proposed, aimed at separating the legal consequences of violating information obligations from those of violating quality and safety requirements. It is argued that the proposed changes do not weaken the traceability system but enhance its resilience by eliminating the internal contradiction between the declared support for producers and the mechanism of compulsory seizure of property for late filing of an electronic document.

KEYWORDS

FSIS «Zerno», grain law, agricultural law, digitalization, legal technique, traceability, quasi-licensing, grain turnover, proportionality of regulation

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Anisimov, A. P. Osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya oborota sel'skohozyaystvennoy produkcii: problemy cifrovizacii / A. P. Anisimov, A. Ya. Ryzhenkov // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. – 2023. – № 4 (153). – S. 180–189. – DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/2227-7315-2023-4-180-189. – EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UXAAXQ.

2. Belov, V. A. Prava na obezlichennye veschi i tovary v oborote / V. A. Belov // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya RF. – 2019. – № 8. – S. 84–102. – EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LKEALV.

3. Bondar', N. S. Sudebnyy konstitucionalizm: doktrina i practice : monografiya / N. S. Bondar'. – 2-e izd., pererab. – Moskva : Norma : INFRA-M, 2021. – 528 s.

4. Gadzhiev, G. A. Konstitucionnye osnovy predprinimatel'skogo prava : monografiya / G. A. Gadzhiev. – Moskva : Norma, 2021. – 256 s.

5. Grazhdanskoe pravo : uchebnik : v 4 t. / otv. red. E. A. Suhanov. – 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. – Moskva : Statut, 2024. – T. IV: Obyazatel'stvennoe pravo. – 1216 s.

6. Svireyko, N. E. Proslezhivaemost' produkcii v zernoproduktovom podkomplekse APK: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika : monografiya / N. E. Svireyko. – Minsk : Institut sistemnyh issledovaniy v APK NAN Belarusi, 2021. – 215 s.

7. Tambovcev, V. L. Teoriya institucional'nyh izmeneniy : monografiya / V. L. Tambovcev. – Moskva : Infra-M, 2021. – 154 s.

8. Habrieva, T. Ya. Konstitucionnye osnovy, tendencii i problemy razvitiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva: 20-letniy opyt i sovremennoe sostoyanie / T. Ya. Habrieva // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 556–563. – EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RBTKXZ.

9. Shastitko, A. E. Ekonomicheskie effekty pravovyh institutov : monografiya / A. E. Shastitko. – Moskva : Delo, 2022. – 320 s.

10. Istochniki na inostrannyh yazykah

11. Peltzman, S. Toward a More General Theory of Regulation / S. Peltzman // Journal of Law and Economics. – 1976. – Vol. 19, No. 2. – P. 211–240. – DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/466880.

12. Stigler, G. J. The Theory of Economic Regulation / G. J. Stigler // The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. – 1971. – Vol. 2, No. 1. – P. 3–21. – DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160.

GOST

Korotchenko P. V., Mayboroda V. A. FGIS «GRAIN» AS A LEGAL INSTITUTION: BETWEEN TRACEABILITY AND QUASI-LICENSING OF TURNOVER // INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL. 2026. no. 3. pp. 220-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25880209_2026_10_3_31. EDN: ELOLBT. (Date of access 02.10.2026).

MLA

Petr V. Korotchenko, Mayboroda V. A.. "FGIS «GRAIN» AS A LEGAL INSTITUTION: BETWEEN TRACEABILITY AND QUASI-LICENSING OF TURNOVER." INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL 9.3 (2026): 220-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25880209_2026_10_3_31. EDN: ELOLBT.

APA

Korotchenko P. V., Mayboroda V. A. (2026). FGIS «GRAIN» AS A LEGAL INSTITUTION: BETWEEN TRACEABILITY AND QUASI-LICENSING OF TURNOVER. INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL, 9(3), 220-237. https://doi.org/10.55186/25880209_2026_10_3_31 EDN: ELOLBT.

Chicago

Petr V. Korotchenko, Mayboroda V. A.. "FGIS «GRAIN» AS A LEGAL INSTITUTION: BETWEEN TRACEABILITY AND QUASI-LICENSING OF TURNOVER." INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL 9, no. 3 (2026): 220-237. https://doi.org/10.55186/25880209_2026_10_3_31. EDN: ELOLBT.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Korotchenko P. V., Mayboroda V. A. | title = FGIS «GRAIN» AS A LEGAL INSTITUTION: BETWEEN TRACEABILITY AND QUASI-LICENSING OF TURNOVER | journal = INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL | year = 2026 | volume = 9 | issue = 3 | pages = 220-237 | doi = 10.55186/25880209_2026_10_3_31 }} EDN: ELOLBT

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

FGIS «GRAIN» AS A LEGAL INSTITUTION: BETWEEN TRACEABILITY AND QUASI-LICENSING OF TURNOVER

Confirmation