Architecture of the institute of state support for agriculture of the leading net food exporters: comparative analysis and lessons for Russia

Natalia Baryshnikova

doi:10.55186/25876740_2026_69_1_138

VAK Russia 5.2.3 UDC 338.43

2 more Collapse

ARCHITECTURE OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATE SUPPORT FOR AGRICULTURE OF THE LEADING NET FOOD EXPORTERS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND LESSONS FOR RUSSIA Architecture of the institute of state support for agriculture of the leading net food exporters: comparative analysis and lessons for Russia

АА Аа

Published in INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL · Issue 1 · Pages 138–144 · Rubric: International experience in agriculture

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_1_138

Received: 11.12.2025 Accepted: 14.01.2026 Published: 15.02.2026

Authors

Natalia Baryshnikova

ORCID

Natalia Baryshnikova

Academic degree: candidate of economic sciences

Science rang: docent

Saratov State Law Academy leading researcher · Russian Federation · Saratov

ORCID

ABSTRACT

The article is devoted to the research of the Institute of state support for agriculture in the countries that are the leading net exporters of food and make a significant contribution to ensuring global food security, in order to implement the best support tools into Russian practice. Methodologically, the article is based on systemic, institutional and dynamic approaches, as well as on the OECD’s comprehensive system for measuring and classifying support to agriculture: the Producer and Consumer Support Estimates (PSE and CSE) and related indicators. The countries were selected for analysis using the net food exports indicator; the largest net exporters include Brazil, EU, Australia, Thailand, Canada, New Zealand, Argentina, whose agriculture produces more food than the population consumes. The study showed that net food exporters are highly differentiated in terms of the absolute size of support, its structure and the tools used. The experience of supporting agriculture in selected countries proves that there is a developed system of institutions working to achieve national strategic objectives, as well as the existence of different models of state support, which tend towards various types, forms and directions of support. Taking into account the continuing weaknesses of the institute of state support for agriculture in the Russian Federation, sanctions pressure and new strategic priorities, the author proposes ways of transforming the institution of state support: strengthening its adaptability and proactive nature; Shift to a model dominated by the least distortive market signals of support; Increase spending on science and innovation, infrastructure, marketing and logistics support; Find a balance between producer and consumer support.

KEYWORDS

agriculture, institutions, net food exports, government support, producer support, consumer support, food security

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Altuhov A. I. Prioritetnoe razvitie sel'skogo hozyaystva -pervoosnova obespecheniya prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti Rossii // Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2025. № 6. S. 9-19.

2. Maslova V. V. Aktual'nye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya gospodderzhki agrarnogo sektora Rossii // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2024. № 6. S. 9-17.

3. Petrikov A. V. Antisankcionnaya politika v sel'skom hozyaystve: kratkosrochnye i srednesrochnye aspekty // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obschestva Rossii. 2024. T. 248, № 4. S. 527-542.

4. Petrikov A. V. Prioritety strukturnoy politiki v sel'skom hozyaystve Rossii // Problemy agrorynka. 2022. № 1. S. 13-23.

5. Uzun V. Ya. Vybor prioritetov politiki eksporta zerna // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2023. № 7. S. 90-96.

6. Uzun V. Ya. Ocenka effektivnosti realizacii agroprodovol'stvennoy produkcii na vnutrennem i vneshnem rynkah: s'edim ili prodadim? // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obschestva Rossii. 2021. T. 229, № 3. S. 210-225.

7. Ushachev I. G. I dr. Prioritetnye napravleniya razvitiya APK na sovremennom etape // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2025. № 1. S. 3-13.

8. Shagayda N.I., Ternovskiy D.S., Shishkina E.A., Elanskaya A.A. Integral'nye pokazateli prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti: ot strany k domohozyaystvu// Voprosy ekonomiki. 2025. № 8. S. 44-69.

9. Polyanskaya, N.M., Kolesnyak A.A., Kolesnyak I.A. Gosudarstvennaya finansovaya podderzhka razvitiya agroprodovol'stvennogo sektora: opyt veduschih zarubezhnyh stran // Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya. 2020. T. 10, № 3. S. 857-878.

10. Prokof'ev, M.N., Sibiryaev A.S. Mirovoy opyt gosudarstvennoy finansovoy podderzhki sel'skogo hozyaystva // Vestnik NGIEI. 2019. № 2(93). S. 119-125.

11. Mal'ceva V. A. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka sel'skogo hozyaystva v zarubezhnyh stranah: evolyuciya teorii i praktiki realizacii. Ekaterinburg: OOO «Izdatel'stvo UMC UPI», 2015. 228 s.

12. Akter S. (2022). The effects of food export restrictions on the domestic economy of exporting countries: A review. October 2022. Global Food Security 35(2). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100657

13. Valea A.B., Tamini L.D., Rousselière D. (2024). Agri‐food trade liberalization, export prices, and quality upgrading: Evidence from the meat and chocolate sectors in OECD countries. February 2024. Agribusiness 41(3):765-791. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21925

14. Zhou H., Fan J., Yang, X., Duan K. (2023). Food Export Stability, Political Ties, and Land Resources. Land 2023, 12, 1824. http://doi.org/10.3390/land12101824

15. Clapp J. (2017). Food self-sufficiency: Making sense of it, and when it makes sense. Food Policy 66 (2017) 88-96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.001

16. Baryshnikova N.A., Kireeva N.A. Prodovol'stvennaya politika i ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' agrarnogo sektora ekonomiki Rossii: opyt institucional'nogo analiza // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo. 2023. T. 23, № 4. S. 379-390.

17. FAO. 2025. World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2025. Rome. URL: http://openknowledge.fao.org/bitstreams/ece7c683-4659-4fd0-b958-4bcbe8654cf7/download (data obrascheniya 20.11.2025).

18. World Trade Organization – Trade Profiles 2023. URL: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/trade_profiles23_e.htm (data obrascheniya 01.07.2025).

19. OECD (2025), Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2025: Making the Most of the Trade and Environment Nexus in Agriculture, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://doi.org/10.1787/a80ac398-en

20. Martini, R. (2011), «Long Term Trends in Agricultural Policy Impacts», OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 45, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgdp5zw179q-en

21. Dewbre, J., J. Antón and W. Thompson (2001), «The Transfer Efficiency and Trade Effects of Direct Payments», American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 83/5, pp. 1204-1214, https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00268

22. The common agricultural policy at a glance. – URL: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-glance_en (data obrascheniya 05.12.2025).

23. OECD (2023), Policies for the Future of Farming and Food in the European Union, OECD Agriculture and Food Policy Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://doi.org/10.1787/32810cf6-en

24. Future Drought Fund. URL: https://www.finance.gov.au/government/australian-government-investment-funds/future-drought-fund (data obrascheniya 05.12.2025).

25. OECD (2021), Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2021: Addressing the Challenges Facing Food Systems, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://doi.org/10.1787/2d810e01-en

26. Cherepanova D. M., Nikulina Yu. N., Yanbyh R. G. Ocenka urovnya gosudarstvennoy podderzhki APK v Rossii i stranah Evropeyskogo Soyuza // Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka. 2022. № 23(5). S.740-750.

PDF JATS XML

Editor-in-Chief

Aleksandr Fomin

Deputy Editor-in-Chief

Tat'yana V. Kazennova

Responsible Secretary

Irina Mamontova

Issue Editor

Gilyana Yakushkina

Literary Editor

Marina G. Fomina

Editorial

Redakcii Sotrudnik

info@mshj.ru

1788

downloads

GOST

Baryshnikova N. A. Architecture of the institute of state support for agriculture of the leading net food exporters: comparative analysis and lessons for Russia // INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL. 2026. no. 1. pp. 138-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_1_138. (Date of access 22.10.2026).

MLA

Natalia Baryshnikova. "Architecture of the institute of state support for agriculture of the leading net food exporters: comparative analysis and lessons for Russia." INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL.1 (2026): 138-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_1_138.

APA

Baryshnikova N. A. (2026). Architecture of the institute of state support for agriculture of the leading net food exporters: comparative analysis and lessons for Russia. INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL(1), 138-144. https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_1_138

Chicago

Natalia Baryshnikova. "Architecture of the institute of state support for agriculture of the leading net food exporters: comparative analysis and lessons for Russia." INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL, no. 1 (2026): 138-144. https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_1_138.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Baryshnikova N. A. | title = Architecture of the institute of state support for agriculture of the leading net food exporters: comparative analysis and lessons for Russia | journal = INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL | year = 2026 | issue = 1 | pages = 138-144 | doi = 10.55186/25876740_2026_69_1_138 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

ARCHITECTURE OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATE SUPPORT FOR AGRICULTURE OF THE LEADING NET FOOD EXPORTERS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND LESSONS FOR RUSSIA Architecture of the institute of state support for agriculture of the leading net food exporters: comparative analysis and lessons for Russia

Confirmation