Food sovereignty: conceptualization and system of assessment indicators

Natalia Baryshnikova

doi:10.55186/25876740_2026_69_3_421

UDC

338.439 338.45

VAK Russia

5.2.3

FOOD SOVEREIGNTY: CONCEPTUALIZATION AND SYSTEM OF ASSESSMENT INDICATORS Food sovereignty: conceptualization and system of assessment indicators

АА Аа

Published in INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL · Pages 421–427 · Rubric: Environmental and food security

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_3_421

Received: 13.03.2026 Accepted: 22.04.2026 Published: 15.06.2026

Authors

Natalia Baryshnikova

ORCID

Natalia Baryshnikova

Academic degree: candidate of economic sciences

Science rang: docent

Saratov State Law Academy leading researcher · Russian Federation · Saratov

ORCID

ABSTRACT

The paper aims to develop a comprehensive approach for assessing the level of food sovereignty through the creation of an indicator system designed to objectively evaluate multiple aspects of food sovereignty and identify critical challenges in the development of the agri-food system. The theoretical foundation draws on works by national and international scholars addressing food security and food sovereignty; a systematic analysis of this literature reveals the absence of comprehensive methodologies for evaluating food sovereignty levels within agri-food systems. Based on the authors' conceptualization of food sovereignty as the right of stakeholders across various levels of food systems (engaged in production, distribution, and consumption) to determine their own policies, strategies, and approaches to economic decision-making, indicators were developed to assess six key aspects: (1) the right to access healthy and culturally appropriate food; (2) the institutional freedom of agri-food system actors; (3) the extent of discrimination in participants' access to production resources; (4) the balance of institutional interests; (5) the sustainability of the agri-food system (encompassing economic, environmental, and social dimensions); and (6) the level of technological sovereignty. For each indicator, the calculation methodology, data sources, and threshold values are specified, with thresholds established through a combination of target-based and expert assessment approaches. Characterized by a multi-stakeholder orientation, systemic perspective, and institutional grounding in the concept of inclusive institutions, the proposed approach complements traditional methods for measuring food security. The methodology not only enables measurement of the current level of food sovereignty but also facilitates the diagnosis of specific institutional barriers that impede the self-determination of agri-food system participants, thereby providing a basis for developing targeted measures to overcome these barriers.

KEYWORDS

agri-food systems, food security, institutional approach, institutional interests, access to resources

1. Doktrina prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federacii (utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 30 yanvarya 2010 goda № 120). URL: http://www.scrf.gov.ru/security/economic/document108 (data obrascheniya 28.02.2026).

2. Altuhov A.I. Paradigma prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti Rossii. M.: Fond «Kadrovyy rezerv», 2019. 685 s.

3. Antamoshkina E. N. Ocenka prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti regiona: voprosy metodologii // Prodovol'stvennaya politika i bezopasnost'. 2015. T. 2, № 2. S. 97-112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18334/ppib.2.2.575

4. Buzdalov I. N. Nauchno obosnovannaya agrarnaya politika - glavnoe uslovie obespecheniya prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti // Nikonovskie chteniya. 2014. № 19. S. 39-44.

5. Gumerov R. R. Prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost': novye podhody k analizu soderzhaniya i ocenke // Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2020. № 5(182). S. 133-141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S107570072005007X

6. Krylatyh E. N. Koncepcii i metodologicheskie osnovy izucheniya prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti // Nikonovskie chteniya. 2014. № 19. S. 3-5.

7. Petrikov A. V. Prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost' i napravleniya nauchno-tehnologicheskoy modernizacii sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii // Nikonovskie chteniya. 2009. № 14. S. 433-435.

8. Suharev O. S. Institucional'nye problemy obespecheniya prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti Rossii // Nacional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. 2015. T. 11, № 6 (291). S. 44-53.

9. Ushachev I. G., Kolesnikov A. V. Nauchnye podhody k ocenke obespecheniya prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti i prodovol'stvennoy nezavisimosti Rossiyskoy Federacii // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2022. № 3. S. 3-18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33305/223-3

10. Uzun V. Ya. Prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost' v usloviyah pandemii: riski i mery po ih snizheniyu // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obschestva Rossii. 2020. T. 223, № 3. S. 502-514. DOI:https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2020-223-3-502-514

11. Shagayda N. I. Prodovol'stvennaya nezavisimost' i prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost' Rossii s tochki zreniya pravil VTO // Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii. 2015. T. 22, № 2. S. 59-62.

12. Shagayda N. I., Uzun V. Ya. Prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost': problemy ocenki // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2015. № 5. S. 63-78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-5-63-78

13. Shut'kov A. A. Prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost': teoriya, politika i praktika. Moskva: Nacional'nyy in-t biznesa, 2011. 475 s.

14. Nyéléni 2007 Forum for Food Sovereignty Full Report. Nyéléni. URL: http://nyeleni.org/DOWNLOADS/Nyelni_EN.pdf (data obrascheniya 28.02.2026).

15. Baryshnikova N. A. Kategoriya «prodovol'stvennyy suverenitet» v issledovaniyah rossiyskih i zarubezhnyh uchenyh: sravnitel'nyy analiz koncepciy i podhodov // Prodovol'stvennaya politika i bezopasnost'. 2024. T. 11, № 3. S. 439-456. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18334/ppib.11.3.121653

16. Gordillo G., Jerónimo O.M. (2013) Food security and sovereignty (base document for discussion), FAO. URL: http://openknowledge.fao.org/bitstreams/61f3f359-669c-40ff-88c6-b39b48135f3a/download (data obrascheniya 28.02.2026).

17. Malov A. V. Prodovol'stvennyy suverenitet: politicheskaya koncepciya, obschestvennoe dvizhenie i kontr-gegemonistskiy diskurs XXI veka // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyy vestnik. 2017. № 65. S. 221-246.

18. Steckley M. (2025). Community-based food sovereignty assessments (FSAs): A review. Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer, vol. 17(1), pp. 257-273. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-024-01500-w

19. Levkoe C. Z., Blay-Palmer A. (2018). Food Counts: Food systems report cards, food sovereignty and the politics of indicators. Canadian Food Studies La Revue Canadienne Des études Sur l’alimentation, no 5(3), pp. 49-75. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v5i3.277

20. Luis Cadavid & Vivek Arulnathan & Nathan Pelletier (2024) Food Security and Food Sovereignty: A Review of Commonly Used Indicators and Consideration of Environmental Sustainability Aspects, Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pp. 1-20, December. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su162411034

21. Ruiz-Almeida, A., Rivera-Ferre, M.G. (2019) Internationally-based indicators to measure Agri-food systems sustainability using food sovereignty as a conceptual framework. Food Security, no. 11(6), pp.1321-1337. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00964-5

22. Schanbacher, W., Bumbaca, D., Jones, L., Vidal, A., Barros-Adwell, C., Olivieri, A., & Kue, J. (2025). Setting tables for community food sovereignty: Building a food sovereignty toolkit. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, no. 14(2), pp. 367-382. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2025.142.019

23. Oliveira M. A. de. (2024). Food sovereignty in practice: A participatory tool for local-level assessment of farming systems. SciELO Preprints 12654, São Paulo: SciELO Preprints Server. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.12654

24. Jernigan V, Blue Bird, Maudrie TL, Nikolaus CJ, Benally T, Johnson S, Teague T, Mayes M, Jacob T and Taniguchi T (2021). Food Sovereignty Indicators for Indigenous Community Capacity Building and Health. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, vol. 5, 704750. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.704750

25. Baryshnikova N. A., Kireeva N. A., Pruschak O. V. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' prodovol'stvennoy sistemy: teoretiko-metodologicheskie podhody k issledovaniyu // Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skohozyaystvennyy zhurnal. 2023. № 1(391). S. 85-91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2023_66_1_85

JATS XML

Editor-in-Chief

Aleksandr Fomin

Deputy Editor-in-Chief

Tat'yana V. Kazennova

Responsible Secretary

Irina Mamontova

Issue Editor

Gilyana Yakushkina

Literary Editor

Marina G. Fomina

Editorial

Redakcii Sotrudnik

info@mshj.ru

GOST

Baryshnikova N. A. Food sovereignty: conceptualization and system of assessment indicators // . 2026. pp. 421-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_3_421. (Date of access 19.08.2026).

MLA

Natalia Baryshnikova. "Food sovereignty: conceptualization and system of assessment indicators." (2026): 421-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_3_421.

APA

Baryshnikova N. A. (2026). Food sovereignty: conceptualization and system of assessment indicators. , 421-427. https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_3_421

Chicago

Natalia Baryshnikova. "Food sovereignty: conceptualization and system of assessment indicators." , no. (2026): 421-427. https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2026_69_3_421.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Baryshnikova N. A. | title = Food sovereignty: conceptualization and system of assessment indicators | journal = | year = 2026 | pages = 421-427 | doi = 10.55186/25876740_2026_69_3_421 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

FOOD SOVEREIGNTY: CONCEPTUALIZATION AND SYSTEM OF ASSESSMENT INDICATORS Food sovereignty: conceptualization and system of assessment indicators

Confirmation