INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL BARRIERS IN THE USE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS IN THE PENZA REGION

Aleksey Malyshev; Nikolay N. Solodkov

doi:10.55186/25880209_2025_9_6_21

UDC

332.14

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL BARRIERS IN THE USE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS IN THE PENZA REGION

Published in INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL · Pages 319–337 · Rubric: 5.2.3. Regional and sectoral economics (economic sciences)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25880209_2025_9_6_21

Received: 01.12.2025 Accepted: 13.01.2026 Published: 13.01.2026

Authors

Aleksey Malyshev

Nikolay N. Solodkov

Aleksey Malyshev

Academic degree: candidate of economic sciences

Penza State Technological University docent · kafedra «Marketing i ekonomicheskaya teoriya» · Russian Federation · Penza

Nikolay N. Solodkov

Academic degree: candidate of geographical sciences

Penza State Agrarian University Associate Professor · Russian Federation · Penza

ABSTRACT

The article examines systemic constraints that impede the effective integration of the region’s religious and confessional heritage into processes of socio-economic and cultural development. The relevance of the study stems from the growing emphasis on domestic tourism as a key priority of national policy, as well as from the unique confessional diversity of the Penza Region, where Orthodoxy, Islam, Old Belief, Catholicism, and Lutheranism have coexisted for centuries. Despite the presence of 199 officially registered cultural heritage sites—predominantly of religious character—their potential remains largely underutilized, necessitating the identification and analysis of persistent institutional and financial barriers. The research is based on an interdisciplinary approach that combines methods from economic geography, sociology, religious studies, and regional economics. Primary data sources include official documents—particularly the Penza Region’s State Program “Development of Culture and Tourism in the Penza Region”—as well as the Wikimedia platform’s database on cultural heritage. The study identifies three key institutional and financial barriers. First, there is a clear prioritization of formal procedures—such as the delineation of protected zones and technical inspections—over activities aimed at restoration, functional adaptation, and promotion of heritage sites. Second, since 2023, subsidies to non-governmental organizations for the reconstruction of the historical appearance of cultural heritage sites have been entirely discontinued—a particularly critical issue for rural areas, where NGOs serve as the main initiators of monument preservation. Third, there is no coherent strategy for integrating cultural heritage into tourism products: ethno-confessional routes have not been developed, digital interpretation of sites is lacking, and religious organizations remain minimally involved. Furthermore, the analysis reveals a significant gap between the declared objectives of the state program—such as increasing tourist numbers and tourism revenues—and the actual allocation of budgetary funds, which are predominantly directed toward administrative and managerial functions rather than practical development.

KEYWORDS

cultural heritage sites, institutional barriers, financial constraints, confessional space, agritourism, Penza Region, religious tourism, sustainable development, tourism potential

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (Project No. 25-28-20463, https://rscf.ru/en/project/25-28-20463/).

1. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 20.09.2019 № 2129-r «Ob utverzhdenii strategii razvitiya turizma v Rossiyskoy Federacii na period do 2035 goda». – URL: http://static.government.ru (data obrascheniya: 15.11.2025).

2. Maslova, I. I. Pravoslavnaya ruinirovannaya arhitektura kak ob'ekt kul'turnogo naslediya i art-prostranstvo tvorcheskoy molodezhi / I. I. Maslova, S. G. Mihalcheva, A. V. Kosaeva // Molodezh'. Duhovnost'. Otechestvo: istoriya i vyzovy sovremennosti: Sbornik nauchnyh statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. – Brest: Brestskiy gosudarstvennyy tehnicheskiy universitet, 2022. – S. 75-78.

3. Regional'nye aspekty formirovaniya rossiyskoy nacii v XVII – nachale XXI v.: (po materialam Povolzh'ya) / S. V. Belousov, A. A. Guschin, O. V. Yagov [i dr.]. – Penza: Penzenskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2017. – 520 s.

4. Dorofeeva, T. G. Religioznye ob'ekty v turizme: uchebnoe posobie / T. G. Dorofeeva. – Penza: Penzenskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet, 2024. – 199 s.

5. Dorofeeva, T. G., Pugacheva, N. P. Palomnichestvo kak fenomen religioznoy kul'tury // Surskiy vestnik. – 2018. – № 3 (3). – S. 63–66.

6. Kulyaeva, E. Yu. Ocenka sovremennogo sostoyaniya turistiko-rekreacionnogo potenciala Penzenskoy oblasti: vyyavlenie problem i puti ih resheniya / E. Yu. Kulyaeva, D. S. Kupryashina // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. – 2019. – № 2–2. – S. 85–88. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24411/2500-1000-2019-10578.

7. Bykova, Yu. S. Razvitie i blagoustroystvo prihramovyh territoriy s uchetom slozhivshihsya pravoslavnyh tradiciy v Penzenskoy oblasti / Yu. S. Bykova, E. P. Tyuklenkova, A. I. Chursin // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovaniy. – 2016. – № 10-2.

8. Tyuklenkova, E. P. Rol' religioznyh kompleksov v razvitii territorii g. Penzy / E. P. Tyuklenkova, M. E. Pershina // Gradostroitel'stvo i arhitektura. – 2023. – T. 13, № 1.

9. Bykova, Yu. S. Razvitie i blagoustroystvo prihramovyh territoriy s uchetom slozhivshihsya pravoslavnyh tradiciy v Penzenskoy oblasti / Yu. S. Bykova, E. P. Tyuklenkova, A. I. Chursin // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovaniy. – 2016. – № 10-2. – S. 273-277.

10. Wikimedia Commons. Kategoriya: Ob'ekty kul'turnogo naslediya Penzenskoy oblasti [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org (data obrascheniya: 15.02.2025)

11. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Penzenskoy oblasti № 1203-pP ot 11.09.2024 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v gosudarstvennuyu programmu Penzenskoy oblasti «Razvitie kul'tury i turizma Penzenskoy oblasti», utverzhdennuyu postanovleniem Pravitel'stva Penzenskoy oblasti ot 22.10.2023 № 783-pP». – URL: https://minkult.pnzreg.ru (data obrascheniya: 15.08.2025).

12. Lyzina, A. G. Kul'tovaya arhitektura Penzenskoy oblasti kak vizual'nyy kod mestnoy identichnosti // Gradostroitel'stvo i arhitektura. – 2022. – T. 12, № 2 (47). – S. 77-82.

13. O sostoyanii grazhdanskogo obschestva v Penzenskoy oblasti: osnovnye prioritety i tendencii: doklad / Obschestvennaya palata Penzenskoy oblasti. – Penza, 2022. – 68 s.

14. Barro, R. J., & McCleary, R. M. Religion and Economic Growth. – National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 2003. – 45 p.

15. Budovich, L. S. The impact of religious tourism on the economy and tourism industry // HTS Teologiese Studies. – 2023. – T. 79. – № 1.

16. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. People's Opium? Religion and Economic Attitudes // Journal of Monetary Economics. – 2003. – Vol. 50, № 1. – P. 225–282.

17. Nunn, N., & Wantchekon, L. The Slave Trade and the Origins of Mistrust in Africa // American Economic Review. – 2011. – Vol. 101, № 7. – P. 3221–3252.

GOST

Malyshev A. A., Solodkov N. N. INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL BARRIERS IN THE USE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS IN THE PENZA REGION // . 2025. pp. 319-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25880209_2025_9_6_21. (Date of access 19.08.2026).

MLA

Aleksey Malyshev, Solodkov N. N.. "INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL BARRIERS IN THE USE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS IN THE PENZA REGION." (2025): 319-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55186/25880209_2025_9_6_21.

APA

Malyshev A. A., Solodkov N. N. (2025). INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL BARRIERS IN THE USE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS IN THE PENZA REGION. , 319-337. https://doi.org/10.55186/25880209_2025_9_6_21

Chicago

Aleksey Malyshev, Solodkov N. N.. "INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL BARRIERS IN THE USE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS IN THE PENZA REGION." , no. (2025): 319-337. https://doi.org/10.55186/25880209_2025_9_6_21.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Malyshev A. A., Solodkov N. N. | title = INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL BARRIERS IN THE USE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS IN THE PENZA REGION | journal = | year = 2025 | pages = 319-337 | doi = 10.55186/25880209_2025_9_6_21 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL BARRIERS IN THE USE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS IN THE PENZA REGION

Confirmation